Olive Network:
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Tootsie_Le_Coq
  • 1 Post By InVinoVeritas

Thread: Katie Hopkins is a Big Nosed Misogynist

  1. #1
    amodernmilitarymother
    Guest

    Katie Hopkins is a Big Nosed Misogynist

    » Katie Hopkins Is A Big Nosed Misogynist » A Modern Military Mother / A Modern Military Mother

    I feel all dirty and disloyal to the sisterhood but really......

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kebabstan, Essex
    Posts
    1,317
    **re-read the blog and realised I had missed the whole point** Apologies.

    I have to say, if I went to the Olympics and got a seat I would not want to be next to a screaming baby. I won't sit next to someone's screaming baby on public transport so why should I put up with it at a sporting event. Or am I missing the point here?

    TLC x
    Last edited by Tootsie_Le_Coq; 26-01-2012 at 15:55.
    Jessticles likes this.

  3. #3
    Member InVinoVeritas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    95
    Why would anyone take a baby, toddler or small child to an Olympic event anyway? I have enough trouble concentrating around Asda when my two year old in in tow, so why would I spend money on a ticket and take her?

    So on that point I wouldn't want to spend money to listen to someone else's child lamenting that they are 'bored' for a couple of hours!
    Jessticles likes this.

  4. #4
    Senior Member kazzam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,094
    I don't think the debate is whether there are babies allowed or not - clearly they are allowed if you can buy tickets for them. The debate is whether their parents should have to pay for tickets for them at all.
    I know I'm in my own little world, but it's ok. They know me here.

  5. #5
    amodernmilitarymother
    Guest
    I didn't see it. I think babies should go free. As much as I agree it's unpleasant to be tormented by annoying children (I include my own). The Olympics should be a family event - unless silence is required like bowls - then sport for all I say. If you get tickets next to screaming kids that's just unlucky. I don't believe in children should be seen and not heard - it's 2012 not 1812. What a fucked up country we are - so insular.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kebabstan, Essex
    Posts
    1,317
    Well, not being a really sporty person, but I thought at football and rugby there are family enclosures. Are the organisers of 2012 not allowing for family enclosures?

    I can think of some more instances where I would not like to sit next to someone else's child regardless of whether they are behaving or not, although I am thinking of children under six or so who tend to squirm and whine. The cinema for starters - why do children's bladders shrink the moment they sit down in a cinema I wonder - they just go back and forth to the toilet for the entire film. And whilst I am on the subject of kids in cinemas, why do some people feel the urge to take their small kiddies to a late night showing of a U or PG film? An opera, any nice restaurant if it is after 8pm -ish.

    I am all for children being seen and heard, as long as they know when to be quiet and behave.

    TLC x

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Katie Price interview
    By dizzyblonde in forum Celebrity Gossip
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 15-07-2009, 09:22

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts